Showing posts with label humanitarian law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label humanitarian law. Show all posts

Monday, July 18, 2011

Mental Health Ordinance 2001


CONSTITUTIONAL POSITION AND REASONS


·        Replaces Lunacy Act 1912
o   A more sensitive law
o   Sensitive treatment of mental illness – omission of words like “idiot” or broad generalizations
o   Larger role for qualified professionals such as psychiatrists to determine mental illness and scope of mental illness
·        The need for regulation
o   Property/Estate Management
o   Management of the patient
·        Health a provincial subject after the 18th Amendment
·        Mental Health Ordinance creates
o   a Mental Health Authority
o   Board of visitors
o   Court of protection
·        Confusion around the Mental health in terms of jurisdiction



 VOLUNTARY AND INVOLUNTARY TREATMENTS



Voluntary treatment: Any person suffering from a mental illness who seeks treatment voluntarily or whose relatives bring him/her for treatment or if a doctor has referred him/her for treatment and the person with mental illness consents to treatment will be examined by a psychiatrist and given appropriate treatment or recommendations. Assessment and/or treatment will be administered only after receiving informed written consent from the person with mental illness, or if it is a minor then by the guardian, or if an adult who by virtue of his mental state is not able to give consent, then by his/her spouse or nearest relative. The person giving consent may withdraw his/her consent for treatment at any time.

Friday, June 17, 2011

Drone Attacks on Pakistani Soil and International Law

Book Recommendation: The Law of Armed Conflict: International Humanitarian Law in War


By Yasser Latif Hamdani
The question of legality of American drone strikes in Pakistan’s tribal areas is one that hits at the core of the laws of war and international law. Two questions need to be asked for us to better understand this debate.