In the Honourable Lahore High
Court at Lahore
W.P. No. ____ of 2012
Rana Mohammad Sohail,
son of Rana Mehdi Hassan, resident of House No. 450 Naz Faridi Kot Mithan District
Rajanpur. … Petitioner
Versus
- Government
of Punjab through Chief Secretary, Secretariat Lahore
- Elite
Police Force, Head Quarters, Elite Police Force, Bedian Center, Bedian
Road, Lahore
- Col Saad Saleem, Commandant/Commanding Officer, Elite Force, Headquarters, Elite Force, Bedian Center, Bedian Road, Lahore … Respondents
______________________________________________________________________
Writ
Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of
Pakistan, 1973
______________________________________________________________________
RESPECTFULLY
SUBMITTED:-
- That the
Petitioner is an employee of Respondent No. 2 who has diligently served
Respondent No.2 as a constable for many years. His meritorious service in
harm’s way is recognized and appreciated by the Petitioner’s
superiors.
- That
in or about April of this year, the Petitioner was asked to attend a month
long refresher physical training course at the Bedian Center owned and
operated by Respondent No. 2.
- That
at the end of the refresher course, the Petitioner along with other
employees was asked to participate in a physical test containing such
rigorous exercises as chin ups, pull ups, pushups and a 1 km run. The
Petitioner passed all but one of these tests i.e. chin ups.
- That
to the Petitioner’s surprise and dismay, as punishment Respondent No. 2
verbally ordered the arbitrary detention of a month of all those employees
that had failed to successfully clear subject to supplementary test to be
conducted in a month’s time.
- The
names of employees so detained are as under:
Saleem Ayaz
|
Sub Inspector
|
District Bahawalnagar
|
Shahid
|
Constable
|
Bahawalnagar
|
Rana Suhail (Petitioner)
|
Constable
|
Rajanpur
|
Wasim Ijaz
|
Constable
|
Rawalpindi
|
Muhammad Akhtar
|
Constable
|
Rawalpindi
|
Asim Farooq
|
Head Constable
|
Rawalpindi
|
Kamran
|
Constable
|
Rawalpindi
|
Faisal
|
Constable
|
Rawalpindi
|
Tasawar Hussain
|
Constable
|
Chakwal
|
Muhammad Zubair
|
Constable
|
Muzaffargarh
|
Arif
|
Constable
|
Lahore
|
Muhammad Iqbal
|
Constable
|
Hafizabad
|
Javed Iqbal
|
Constable
|
Lahore
|
Tariq Hameed
|
Constable
|
Lahore
|
Zahid Nadeem
|
Head Constable
|
|
Abdul Ghafoor
|
Head Constable
|
|
Atiq ur Rahman
|
Head Constable
|
|
Iqbal Shahzad
|
Head Constable
|
|
Mujahid Hussain
|
Head Constable
|
|
Fayaz
|
Constable
|
Multan
|
- That
these employees of Respondent No. 2 are in detention and therefore have
been unable to be made parties to this instant writ petition. However
these employees also intend to become parties to the instant proceeding
and will be incorporated at a later stage.
- That
these employees have been kept isolated and their freedom of movement has
been restricted.
- That
the arbitrary verbal order of Respondent No. 3 and all subsequent actions
of Respondent No. 2 and Respondent No. 3 to detain and hold against their
will the aforesaid persons, including the Petitioner, is unconstitutional,
arbitrary, illegal, unlawful and without any justification on the
following grounds:
Grounds:
I.
The
arbitrary detention of the aforesaid persons, including the Petitioner
militates against Articles 9 and 10 of the Constitution of the Islamic
Republic of Pakistan, in so far as it takes without lawful authority the
liberty of the aforesaid persons. There is absolutely no lawful basis for
Respondent No. 3’s order.
II.
The
bondage in which the aforesaid persons are kept against their will and without
lawful authority by Respondents No. 2 and 3 is tantamount to slavery and
therefore vitiates Article 11 of the
Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Further more this amounts to
a compulsory service of a cruel nature and therefore in particular violates Article 11(4)b
III.
The
bondage in which the aforesaid persons are kept is a sheer violation of Article 14 of the Constitution which
guarantees the dignity of man. By detaining innocent persons who have served
the state diligently and faithfully, the dignity of the aforesaid persons has
been irrevocably shattered.
IV.
The
arbitrary detention of aforesaid persons amounts to a denial of the fundamental
right of movement which is guaranteed under Article 15 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
V.
The
arbitrary, unlawful and unconstitutional detention of the aforesaid persons
militates against Article 25 of the
Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan because none of the other
employees in previous refresher physical courses have been detained in this
manner. Therefore this arbitrary, unlawful
VI.
The
persons employed by Respondent No. 2 are civilians and not subject to any
special military law or otherwise. Nothing in the terms of their employment terms
or agreement allow for such arbitrary detention.
VII.
The
actions of the Respondents violate Articles
3 and 4 of the Constitution of
the Islamic Republic of Pakistan in so much as it is exploitative of the
persons aforesaid and violates their right to be treated according to law.
- The
petitioner submits that the petition involves substantial questions of law
as to the interpretation and effect of the Constitution of Pakistan:
- The
respondents’ head quarters are based in Lahore and the whole of cause of
action has arisen within the jurisdiction of the Hon'able High Court. The
High Court therefore has jurisdiction to hear and dispose off this
petition.
- The
petitioner has no other remedy for the redress of injuries complained
heretobefore under any other law for the time being in force.
- The
petitioner has not submitted any other writ or petition to this Hon'able
Court or the Supreme Court of Pakistan, in respect of the subject matter
of this petition.
WHEREFORE
it is
respectfully prayed that the Petitioner, along with other persons above, be
released from this arbitrary, unconstitutional and illegal detention which is
tantamount to slavery and cruel and unusual compulsory service beyond the call
of duty;
AND
WHEREFORE it is
prayed that this Hon’able Court directs Respondent No. 3 to answer as to under
what authority has Respondent No. 3 detained these men against their will;
AND
WHEREFORE it is
prayed that that Respondent No. 2 and Respondent No. 3 be restrained from
carrying out any retributive action against the Petitioner and others; and
Any other relief that this
Hon’able Court deems fit may also kindly be granted.
Petitioner
Through
Yasser
Latif Hamdani
Advocate High Court
PLH
No. 42545
CERTIFICATE:
As per
the instructions of the Client, this is the first writ petition on the subject
before this Honourable Court.
ADVOCATE
No comments:
Post a Comment
Be respectful and you shall be heard.